I know what you’re thinking, I’m being a show-off area specialist, Asian language names can be hard for anglophones (and vice versa), and who cares about KIS anyway, because this crisis is about Kim Jong Un? All of that is true of course, especially the first one, but come on…
Richardson isn’t just any old hack like me on North Korea. (Here’s my take on the crisis.) He has been a regular point man for the US on NK for more than a decade and markets himself as such on the talk-shows. And if you study NK in even the most basic way (here’s a good place to start), you know who KIS is. He’s everywhere. He founded the state in 1948 and ruled it until 1994 as his own personal fiefdom. The whole country is built around his personality cult. The regime even started calling its ideology ‘Kimilsungism,’ giving up the fictions of Marxism, communism, etc. KJU has called NK ‘KIS country’ and explicitly models himself after KIS in his clothing, hairstyle, and girth. Statues of KIS are everywhere, and Richardson has been there apparently eight times. I went there just once, and I’ve got my propaganda down pat about the Great Korean Leader, Comrade KIS’ heroic construction of socialism in our style under the revolutionary guidance of the Korean People’s Army defending the peasant and workers against the bourgeois imperialist Yankee Colony..… (I could keep going like that for a few more sentences if you like).
So why is Richardson making this undergraduate error on Piers Morgan? At first, I thought he was actually saying Kim Young Sam, a former president of SK, then I wasn’t quite sure what he actually said. Worse were Morgan’s other two guests, Wesley Clark, whom I actually like, but was totally out of his depth, and Nicholas Kristof, whose admirable, but relentlessly self-congratulatory, human rights advocacy seems to have convinced him that he is an authority on autocracies everywhere now.
And Morgan clearly hadn’t been prepped at all. When I do media on NK, I spend up to 30 minutes with producers talking about ideology, marketization from below, corruption, and the rationality of NK acquiring nukes (to defend itself against regime change) and trying to shake-down its neighbors (so that it does not have to change, which would call into question why it still exists at all apart from SK). But Morgan would have none of that; he just winged it completely. It was cringe-worthy. The questions were the standard undergrad-neocon-video game take on the place – North Korea as a strange, weird, erratic, unpredictable; KJU as a maniac nutball, and so on. Basically, you learned nothing in 8 minutes.
I can think of so many well-qualified, well-published NK experts in the US, vastly better than I’ll ever be: Lankov, Cha, Kang, Cumings, Anderson, just to name a few. But you never see these guys on CNN. It’s the just same generalists again and again – Zakaria, Amanpour, ex-generals, and so on. And Fox is even worse where its just Bolton, Hannity, and Jennifer Rubin. Yikes. And don’t forget the guy who blamed gay marriage on the Norks.
All this stuff makes me think of the regular cultural critique of US diplomacy – that in conflicts like Vietnam, Afghanistan, or Iraq, we really didn’t have the cultural experts around to help teach ourselves about these places, so that we knew how to use force in a more adept way. For example, in Vietnam, US soldiers often thought Vietnamese civilians were mocking them when they smiled profusely; in fact, this was intended as a politeness, because they could not understand English. (Korean soldiers in Vietnam had the same misunderstanding, which lead to problems of abuse.)
This strikes me as a really obvious downside to American ‘exceptionalism.’ If we are really the ‘end of history’ and the ‘last, best hope for mankind,’ then why the hell do we need to learn about other countries? It’s just so much easier to roll out our ‘inside every g— there is an American trying to get out’ orientalism and assume ‘they’ are just like us. So instead of attaching some anthropologists or area experts to the force (because that’s for sissies), let’s just buy more weapons instead – and fire those experts if they are gay. And then we wonder why we get blowback – because we don’t actually understand how our behavior was perceived locally.
This is also why I am so skeptical of the ‘pivot.’ I have an essay in galleys coming later this year, but just sending the Navy to the western Pacific won’t be enough to really engage China and Asia generally. We need some cultural training too, but Americans aren’t really interested in Asia. More Americans learn Latin than Chinese, and the GOP, supposedly the party that cares about foreign policy, is theologically obsessed with the Middle East. The pivot won’t be culturally sustainable if Asia is just seen as an export platform for cheap stuff at Walmart. Here’s an example of what we might do, but won’t, because we’re too insular, pardon me, ‘exceptional,’ to bother.
Cross-posted at Asian Security Blog.
That’s the worst kind of journalism. When they do not know the matter, a thing is only explained by simplification and sensationalism. Here in Italy the situation is even worse, and It’s really impossibile to listen a bright analyst on our TV.
Yeah, this TV analyst is the worst: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLaLCR_fe1FTuJZE4H61P373QmzqJTatN6&feature=view_all
I am surprised at Bill Richardson’s screw up. He has been one of the few able to negotiate with other regimes. I didn’t know him well, but I did spend some time with him over a few beers while trying to stop a small ‘war’ from breaking out in the mountains of Northern New Mexico. He was a good friend of my good friend, Rep. Mickey Leland, killed in a mysterious plane crash in Africa. Bill can and should do better.
My comments were not intended to come as ad hominem. I’m sorry if they did.
No problem, if Bill screwed up, then he screwed up. I have to agree, the drum roll from the so-called main stream media (I don’t count faux news) has been deafening and very ill informed. On the other hand, it certainly has not affected the Thai Baht here, except for the USD dropping even lower. I liked the Financial Times (always a favorite read) article, forwarded it to a bunch of Americans, some of whom will appreciate and understand, some of whom………….well what can I say.
Robert it seems to me that you’re trying to use Richardson’s slip up to make a general point. In that sense I think you could have been gentler in your treatment of him–after all it was on live television not an op-ed piece that he made the error. The general point you raise is valid but I think there too you’re making an error. Let’s call it an error in judging levels of generality. Surely you wouldn’t suggest that there is anything really like an expert on the DPRK or any country. You can say there is an expert on its foreign policy, its military etc. Then if we are going to be informed about what is happening in North Korea it would be helpful to listen to a panel of experts each having expertise on a particular facet of the DPRK. I tend to think that the business of communications tends to rely on known brands who can give a largely informed audience the sense (sometimes falsely) of having been educated about an issue.
Pingback: Escalation in the Korean Crisis: What will the NK Military do if Japan Shoots Down the Missile Launch? | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog
Pingback: What will the North Korean Military do if Japan Shoots Down the Missile Launch? » Duck of Minerva
Pingback: What if US/Japan Tries to Shoot Down a North Korean Missile & They Miss? | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog
Pingback: What if US/Japan Try to Shoot Down a North Korean Missile & They Miss? » Duck of Minerva
Pingback: NKorea Recap (2): NK is an ‘Upper Volta with Nukes’, so Ignore Them | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog
Pingback: North Korea is an ‘Upper Volta with Missiles’ who Cried Wolf Too Often » Duck of Minerva
Pingback: My ‘Introduction to North Korea’ Essay for Al Jazeera Center for Studies | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog
Pingback: My January Diplomat Essay: Top 5 Northeast Asian Security Stories in 2013 | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog
Pingback: My National Interest Essay on the Ridiculous Media Hysteria over Kim Jong Un’s Disappearance | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog